PAN Communique (1:1) -- We Are Contemporaries

topic posted Tue, November 1, 2005 - 3:31 AM by  galen
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement

Monday, October 31, 2005

PAN Communique (1:1) -- We Are Contemporaries

Dennis "galen" Mitrzyk < denzen@umich.edu >

{Note: This is a communique from PAN, the Peoples' Action Network. As always, your thoughts and input are welcome. Please feel free to share this, in toto, with your community. Visit www.panparty.org to learn more about the Peoples' Action Network, PAN.}

We are contemporaries. This might seem to be a trite observation at first, but reflection reveals insight. We're in this -- this time -- together. We can communicate, collaborate, celebrate. We face the same unprecedented challenges, the same exhilarating opportunities. If we cower in fear, lull ourselves with apathy, bliss out in ignorance, or wallow in self-indulgence... we are the problem. But if we visualize, organize, metamorphize, crystallize, find solidarity, solace, and strength in our shared conviction that another world is possible, we become the solution.

George Bernard Shaw may have been right when he said, "Hegel was right when he said that we learn from history that man can never learn anything from history". I say, "know your history", they say, "no, you're history!"; but that was Zen... this is Tao.

You can deny the omens, pooh-pooh the prophecies... but you can not stop an idea whose time has come. And the time has come for the return of the "thought leaders"... time for the reconstitution of the Constitution. We be the eco-creatives, the Rainbow Warriors, the ubermensch -- aware, awake, and no need to fake it. Sure, they say, "just fake it till ya make it", but we've gone far beyond faker and fakir. Remember though, that believing you're enlightened is a necessary but not sufficient condition of being enlightened, there's also the peer review process. Survey says...

For real zeal... hermetically sealed... true nature revealed. The people wanna know, "Is there Rumi 'nuf for everyone?". Yes, indeed; but if you spell "clan" with a "k", i've got some bad news for you. Bad news too for the guy at Harbin Hot Springs who mused that there is no "evil", only "ignorance". I thought, "Humph, then you are evil by your own definition because you're clearly ignorant of evil!".

Have you not seen the face of evil? ...not necessarily in the hallway mirror, but in the halls of power? Wholesale terror perpetrated by the State -- an unholy alliance of big government, big business, big academia, and organized religion -- in the pretext of preemptive wars of "liberation" is accepted by the unwitting masses as a necessary evil to combat the manufactured evil of retail terrorism. To be sure, 9-11 was an act of terror, though the terrorists who pulled it off do not live in caves on the other side of the planet, they live in plush, war-profit, splendor right under our noses on Pennsylvania Avenue and wherever else the PNAC (Project for the New American Century) neocons dwell.

The widely-accepted official narrative of 9-11 actually violates several laws of physics, chemistry, and thermo-dynamics. Use some common sense... there is absolutely no way that those airplanes caused two 109-story steel and concrete skyscrapers to crumble at free-fall speed into a pile of dust and molten steel. All three WTC skyscrapers that fell on 9-11 were brought down by controlled demolition.

Most people don't even know that a third building -- WTC Building 7, 47 floors tall -- totally collapsed in on itself at near free-fall speed on 9-11. Silverstein, one of the lease-holders, even admitted on national TV to having the building "pulled" -- slang for demolished -- at 5:20 the afternoon of 9-11. There's a big problem with this: it takes several weeks, not a couple hours, to rig a skyscraper for demolition. Not a single member of the criminally complicit major-media machine had any questions about this incriminating claim by co-conspirator Larry Silverstein.

On the bright side, we metaphysicians owe the USG (US Government) a huge debt of gratitude for proving once and for all that "might does NOT make right". Light makes right. Can the charge of the Light Brigade be far off?

Interestingly enough, it's Republican Congressman Ron Paul, not Democratic-apologist Dennis Kucinich, who is standing up to the Bush-Cheney cabal. He had some strong words for the ruling elite about their seemingly imminent declaration of martial law and the formal creation of a police state (www.prisonplanet.com/article...sh.htm). The excuse will either be another extremely suspicious 9-11 "false flag" operation or an equally suspicious Avian/Spanish Flu pandemic. Come hell or high water, the Bush-Cheney cabal in league with the supine Democratic party will have their martial law. Furthermore, if it's because of a flu pandemic, you'd better brace yourself for a USG-mandated vaccination! Oh, isn't that convenient.

While this all sounds like nothing but "doom and gloom", there are ample signs of hope on the horizon. Remember those "thought leaders"? those Rainbow Warriors? Well guess what? We're not afraid. We refuse to be pricked or tricked by the fear-mongers and war-criminals who have tried to seize control of our destiny. It's time to wake up, America, to the rather uncomfortable fact that we've met the enemy and the enemy is not us, the USA, but the USG.

The old saw goes, "What do you call a busload of lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A good start". The new one goes, "What do you call the indictment of Cheney accomplice, Lewis 'Scooter' Libby? ...a good start". Herein lies more hope. Potential hero of the people, Patrick Fitzgerald, is apparently extending his Grand Jury investigation of the Plame leak and the false casus belli for war. Yes, the entire Bush-Cheney cabal and their Democratic partners in crime are caught between Iraq and a hard place. Had only they spent more time reading their mythology they'd know the price one ultimately pays for pathological hubris is utter ruin.

Sometimes laughter's the best medicine... satire, the greatest weapon. Here's a little animation that brought a smile to my face (www.endofworld.net/).

Sooner or later, enough people are going to start scratching their heads and thinking the unthinkable: Is the all-powerful nation State an idea whose time has come and gone? Should California secede from the Union? Should the San Francisco Bay Area secede from California and form an autonomous bioregion?

Yes, we can seize this historic opportunity, as the old order collapses under the weight of mind-boggling corruption and breathtaking hypocrisy, to write a new social contract, to remake the world. It's up to us, not the US... each and every one of us. Know your history, then go out and make some.

~ Copyright PAN 2005 ~
posted by:
galen
SF Bay Area
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: PAN Communique (1:1) -- We Are Contemporaries

    Tue, November 1, 2005 - 6:54 AM
    galen, although we have one end in common, the final end is one that could not be more different. If we were to witness the fall of the united states government, we would end up engaging each other for a war over the ashes.

    The word Individual Sovereignty is nothing more than a big word for Self Governance, or Anarchy. The law of God does not stand, because God does not exist (if you're thinking about posting debate to this post cos I just said this, please remove yourself from this tribe, you dont understand the concept of logic, go figure that out first); The law of the state does not stand, as the state is an abstract designed by man enacted by the gun and the consequences of action against it, and thus is enacted by means of force and fear (And thus no government can be truely free).

    The law of nature stands, that the strong will survive, and the weak will fall. If a tiger is captured by a family of spider monkeys, the spider monkeys have proven themselves stronger in mind and thus will befall any opposition who posesses less a mind then themselves.

    If a man is born on an island and his mother dies shortly after raising him to the point where he can live on his own. He becomes the government, he self governs, as a reckless child in this situation is weak and will parish. Because he has the will to survive, he will regulate his own actions as an individual, not that certain actions are wrong, but because they may hold logical consequences and the only one who stands to lose out is himself.

    Throw another person on that island, and there may be a rivalry over land, resources etc.; give each of them a gun and they will be cooperative or kill each other. Put a third person who's only intent on the island is to make a profit, and he will exploit the situation. He will provide protection to the first (or second) for exchange of food. Multiply everything by 100,000 and you will have the first IndivSov society.

    Man has the ability to murder someone, steal, rape, etc. However it is not a right. How then do rights define freedom? I have the ability to speak, why do I need a right to tell me I have permission. I have the ability to worship something, if I choose, why do I need a right to do so? Because the fuedal lords who defined the idea of rights where nothing more than salesmen. Restrict everything except what we say is allowed.
    • Re: PAN Communique (1:1) -- We Are Contemporaries

      Tue, November 1, 2005 - 4:12 PM
      Hi Liam,

      Thanks for your reply to my post. I'd like to find a way for everyone on this planet to get along and live their lives to the fullest of their abilities without interference from government and other people. I don't buy your claim that you and i would be fighting over the ashes once the fascistic USG falls.

      I could care less if you believe in "god". I believe "i am that i am" and as such, i am a manifestation of god. I also believe in anarchy and individual sovereignty. If you try to claim that i don't understand "logic", you're going to have a very difficult time selling me on that claim as well. I have degrees in Physics and Math from UM, i've actually studied logic, so please don't try to act like i don't know what i'm talking about just because you may not agree with me. I was taking LSD and having a direct experience of the divine in '77, well before you were even born, so please don't pretend that you know more about the nature of "being" than i.

      I'm interested in having a conversation with you Liam, but it must be based on mutual respect.

      In Peace,

      galen
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: PAN Communique (1:1) -- We Are Contemporaries

        Wed, November 2, 2005 - 5:54 AM
        Forget what you thought about me not claiming you understand logic. Because this is a public forum, I usually try to encompass all possible replies in my initial post, obviously (as I realize reading it over again) I addressed it to you at the begining. after the first paragraph it becomes a public address type deal.
      • Unsu...
         
        sorry I can't help myself...

        "I was taking LSD and having a direct experience of the divine in '77"

        You don't maybe think that these "divine" experiences were a result of the LSD? I mean, that seems like more than a coinsidence...

Recent topics in "* Individual Sovereignty *"